Buddhism, pop-culture, and the homogenization of the Dharma

Tuesday, June 16th, 2009

[ jump to comments ]

Download the file [PDF/4.7mbs; 27 pages]

Presented as part of a panel on Shin Buddhism in the west at the XIV Biennial meeting of the International Association of Shin Buddhist Studies, this paper is a more reasoned, researched, and well-articulated version of some themes with which my long-time readers will be familiar: Orientalism, the dumbing-down of Buddhism, and the politics of representation.

I did not actually read this paper. Unfortunately, I was unable to get to Kyoto this year, but I understand that it was read by Henry Adams in my stead and that the panel was a success. Thanks to Daniel Friedrich for putting it all together.

This paper problematizes representations of Buddhism in (Western) pop-culture in two separate but related ways. First, I argue that these representations are little more than a continuation of a centuries-long project of defining the Oriental “other” in ways that make Asian culture safe and palatable for Western consumers. Second, by defining Buddhisms and Buddhists in non-threatening ways, these representations perpetuate certain stereotypes about Buddhism that do little to advance the needs of Buddhist communities and, ultimately, create the false notion that “all Buddhisms look alike.”

10 reactions

leave a comment




  • XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>